The Bible told me so (2/9)
|
|
 |
Does God really hate homosexuality, or was it just a cultural rule? The hidden truth about what the Bible REALLY says about GAYS. Find out what the church doesn’t want you to know. Here is the REAL meaning behind the scriptures.
Related posts:
@KodeLiMe Your religion preaches 100% certainty. And that becomes a problem when mixed with human psychology. People like to be right. And when their right they tend to hang it over peoples heads. The fact that you believe your religion is right does not make your religion a fact. When religion begins to take that rout things will improve greatly. But it never will.
@punca Verbatim practiced religion cannot survive in the presence of thinking people.
There is no good or evil. There is only a world of sunshine and rainbows where people can all live in peace.
we should preach love and not religion. simple as that.
that asshole in the beginning that said that they needed to take god’s ground back you know what i say fuck that guy and if god was real how in the fuck could we take his ground if he’s so powerful
the bible is just a freakin book!!!start thinking with ur own head ppl.
there is no God, Jesus didnt die for ya. get over it
I am a Christian and I would just like to say that ALL Christians need to stop judging people and causing division. Christ died for EVERYONE and God is the ultimate judge, not us. The number one thing we need to focus on is the Gospel, telling the world about it, allowing for rejection of it (because people are going to reject it) moving on and allowing God to judge. That’s what Christ told us to do and we should do nothing else besides that. We are not judges and we need to accept that. The end
So sad to see how religion divides people and how it actually spawns this hatred for another human being just cause of their sexuality. Is the bible really that important?
@gellymatos
leephon refuses to directly answer questions put to him/her. He/she is content with continually TRYING to berate and belittle others that disagree with his/her argument.
His main point is that the ‘desert religions’ propagate bigotry and discrimination. I, and others have asked point blank questions and receive only rambling and evasion.
I can only assume that his/her position is so weak that it can not withstand questioning.
@gellymatos …from what I saw, both of you were topic hopping. You don’t think so? Whatever. You were still the one using verbal abuse as though it actually proves a point. And do you mean homosexuals being labeled as bigots or of you labeling others as bigots? Because that sentence seems to sound like the former and Im sure you mean the latter.
@leephon My point is that you could have has support from me, but now I’m not exactly inclined to do so, am I? Really?Many desert religions? Considering society isn’t just one single entity, I wouldn’t consider them needing to adopt themselves to anything. What you call “society” is nothing more than what you live in. As for what I didn’t claim, you were the one that said I noticed Jonah’s rambling when I never noted any such thing. So, the obvious escaped who? Oh, right, you. Look…
Third, You didn’t make such claim. I did. Now I see how unfortunate that such obvious escaped you. Moreover, it wasn’t me who was topic-hopping. I was merely following his escapade into the erratic and digressive domain of issues.
Initially, I made a comment about discriminatory attitude of people who oppose homosexuality and label them as bigots. I view one’s sexual preference as no different as one’s color of skin or gender.
Rule #1: There is no crying on the Internet. I don’t care if he is your niece or a guy who gave you a reach-around. Your interpersonal association with another YouTube user means nothing to me. Drop the melodrama.
Again, your faith is not germane–only how your values interface with the rest of the world. So far, many desert religions have failed to adopt themselves to today’s social melee, collective and historical human progress to achieve equality.
@leephon First, you really should be careful who you’re talking to when you’re putting someone down. 777jonah888 is a friend of mine. Second, I myself am catholic, something of importance in this argument. Third, I never said he was rambling. Frankly, I found both of you were jumping from subject to subject, whether you meant to or not. And you’re the only one being uncivil about it. So, I ask again, what topic started this thing?
@gellymatos
Thank you for noticing my interlocutor’s discursive rambling. People usually have a short attention span which impedes them from debating one topic at time. Red herring, emotional outbursts, and general congenital idiocies are common during discourse. For instance, when I specifically expound on a proper relation between two consensual adults, they assume my definition of adulthood is equivalent of pedophilia and by two, I’m referring to “many.” How do you argue with these fools?
@leephon No need to be rude about it. I have read the what appears to be most of it and you two seem to jump to an from different exact subjects. What’s the overall point that is being debated.
I’m not responsible for your failure to express your point of view without diving into discursive rambling. I am really not.
@gellymatos I’m not going to spoon feed you everything. Read all my correspondence with Jonah from the start to finish.
leephon, if you are referring to my comments then you responded just how I thought you (or anyone who takes your position) would.
The posts are not in order of their posting. Anyone who takes leephon’s position is free to try to answer as well.
@leephon
You did exactly what I thought you would; like anyone who cannot defend the position that they espouse. No one on this planet can successfully defend it.
@leephon Alright, what’s this argument exactly about?
Seeing you cannot possibly put together a coherent sentence, I am obligated to ignore you until you can come up with a better way to articulate your poorly constructed thoughts.
Your responses suffer from the same diversionary fallacy. Do you have a reading comprehension deficiency? Or were you so convened in your own little world that couldn’t help but to read between the lines?
Did you see I specifically mentioned “two” adults and refrained from making this about multiple partners? The topic is about homosexual couples; try to have an attention span of more than a 5-year-old. What does a “married” couple with multiple partners have anything to do with this?
You state………….Let me be as clear as possible here so you don’t go around conceal the true intent of the radicals.
Who exactly are the ‘radicals’ ?
Please be specific and if you could give me an example besides that Wesboro place please.