Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl – Episode 027

83834 king james bible default Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl   Episode 027

This Weeks Bible Question: Why do you only use the King James Bible? www.nogreaterjoy.orgBible Questions with Michael Pearl. A weekly show that answers all questions about the bible - but don't come looking for his opinion - because only the Word of God will suffice. Taking away the mysticism of what the Bible says we present to you some questions most every American Christian has - along with stranger topics like angels, wizards, giants, and creation. Submit your question to biblequestions@nogreaterjoy.org or call and leave a brief question at (931) 805-4820


Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl - Episode 027

Holy Bible Complete King James Version DVD (2009) Old & new Testament BRAND NEW

230791169654 0 Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl   Episode 027US $3.04 (6 Bids)
End Date: Monday May-21-2012 5:51:33 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

Open Bible King James Version Cowhide Leather 647# Rare NIB Personal size 1975
280879285454 0 Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl   Episode 027US $200.00
End Date: Monday May-21-2012 6:09:55 PDT
Buy It Now for only: US $200.00
Buy it now | Add to watch list

Biblia Juvenil Bilingue Youth Bible Reina-Valera 1960 , New King James Version
120817215526 0 Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl   Episode 027US $79.00
End Date: Monday May-21-2012 6:21:30 PDT
Buy It Now for only: US $79.00
Buy it now | Add to watch list

Related posts:

  1. A Brief History of the King James Bible
  2. Holy Bible, Giant Print Presentation Edition: King James Version
  3. Boldtext Pew Bible: King James Version
  4. The Chronological Study Bible: New King James Version
  5. Discovering the King James Bible

19 Responses to Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl – Episode 027

  1. forhisglory723

    I personally enjoy the CJB …….It opens up the Scripture in a whole new light. Jesus our Lord was Hebrew, and to understand? Scripture from the Hebraic view, is very amazing, and incredible. CJB is Complete Jewish Bible

  2. truthfulreply

    I’ll take the original one -My Catholic Bible
    The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed. | 2008 | COPYRIGHT 1993 The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia Copyright © 2002,
    Vulgate [Lat. Vulgata editio =common edition], most ancient? extant version of the whole Christian Bible . Its name derives from a 13th-century reference to it as the “editio vulgata.” The official Latin version of the Roman Catholic Church, it was prepared c.AD 383-AD 405 by St. Jerome (c.342-420) at the request of Pope St. Damasus I

  3. micmoable

    King James bible is only worthy version of God’s Word—all those modernized and watered-down versions can lead folks astray ?

  4. xsandsnowx

    Amen, Brother. Very well and? humbly said.

  5. mwilson70201

    Good video brother. I could never understand why so many who profess faith in Christ can’t pass up an opportunity to attack the word? of their salvation. It’s beyond comprehension that “christians” deny God preserved a perfect bible. They have more faith in scholarship then they do in scripture. How can this be? Textual critics comprise the protestant version of the Catholic magisterium, the group of cardinals that determine what is and isn’t God’s truth. They are modern Scribes and Pharisees.

  6. gillamrl

    @YTubeCheese You? are greatly mistaken.. sad

  7. Wyowanderer777

    Excellent, thank you? kindly!

  8. becomingbatmitzvah

    @TheKJVberean I don’t know which “God” “anointed” the KJV. The KJV does not even claim that. It’s only a translation. I don’t which “God” you claim anointed the KJV, because the God I believe created the heavens? and the earth and was around a lot longer than the KJV. What was the “anointed” version before the KJV came around? Did God thunder it down from Mt. Sinai?

  9. becomingbatmitzvah

    One place I find that the KJV surpasses all is Romans 8:1 “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.”? Most versions leave that out.

  10. YTubeCheese

    The fellow in this video is very mistaken. Here are just a few examples: (1) the KJV isn’t based on a majority text. While the? TR follows a Byzantine majority reading most of the time, it has some readings that are way outside the mainstream. (2) The translators of the KJV admitted in their preface that their work wasn’t perfect; that only the autographs were perfect. (3) God has blessed many translations with very widespread, traditional acceptance in the church’s history, e.g. Vulgate and NIV.

  11. ledzeplad

    if? the king james bible is so good why is the western world so bad?

  12. vincent15641

    The hidden wisdom mentioned at 1st Corinthians 2:7 will only manifest in the King? James Bible. For examples, See the Aimed At America 1 video because there are too many parallels for these KJV Scriptures to be coincidences!

  13. ThyWordIsFire

    @Yahuwnathan Jesus’ name in Ancient Hebrew is YAHAWAHSHI, get it right people!!! His name ends with the Ancient Hebrew character “O” which sounds like “EYE” the pictograph character looks like an “EYE” which sounds like “EYE”, its where the word EYE comes from…imagine that.

    None of the fake names end with a “LONG I” sound, because theyre all? incorrect. Yeshua, Yahshuah, Jesus are all obviously incorrect.

    Reject that name and you get rejected.

  14. Providential1611

    @becomingbatmitzvah Easter is not paganism brought in. I? will refer to you a study on this–I need to go find it.

  15. Providential1611

    @Yahuwnathan Paul quotes from Joel as well and there we are informed that the name of the Lord? we are to call upon is Jesus Christ!

  16. Yahuwnathan

    @Providential1611 Matthew 3:3 – John the Baptist quotes from Isaiah 40:3 and says, “Prepare the of the LORD (YHWY).” In Acts 2, Peter quotes from Joel, “Whoever callon the name of the LORD (YHWH) will be saved.” I dont think they were saying kurios or lord here. They were (1) quoting from the OT, and (2) speaking to? other Hebrews. The Dead Sea Scrolls and Greek Septuagint do not translate the Name but keep it in the AbraYA – Paleo-Hebrew langauge. So why do we translate it?

  17. becomingbatmitzvah

    A big problem I have with the King James, though I use it in writing and find it basically accurate, is the word “Easter”. KJV can’t be perfect, it’s not the exact word that issued from God, anyway. It’s pretty good, but because the pagan Romans brought Easter in the Church to replace Passover at the Council of Nicea (“to avoid the despicable company of the Jews” – blatant? antisemitism) then later on the translators enforced their own ideas on the text. I noticed several mistakes in the OT too.

  18. IELTSExamination

    Preach the? Word brother.

  19. Providential1611

    @Yahuwnathan You don’t understand TRANSLATION. Jesus IS Iesous in ENGLISH. The ear;y churdch preached YEASU AND YEASUS CHRISTOS. They did not preach Yahuwah, yeshua or any other name the Judaizers fight AMONGST THEMSELVES ABOUT! The ironic and comical thing is that even in these groups there is serious disagreement and fightings. I have read from them and realized NONE OF THEM know what they are talking about. Sinaiticus has the word IESOUS hundreds of times. What is your point??

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>